Is 1973 retro?

This deceptively easy child’s pinafore still required some swear words and a go with the quick unpick to finish.

I let my little girl (aged nearly 4) pick out the fabric from my stash, some sort of cotton, only 1 yard needed. Of course, she wouldn’t model the finished dress, so here is a photo before it was finished when I was just seeing how much to hem it by.

What I really like about this pattern is that I am myself a child of the 70s and I know I wore this sort of thing myself……

• Meet the Author • Charlotte Tilley



Love what you've seen so far? Subscribe by email to receive all the week's posts delivered to your inbox in one big glorious email every Friday.

Inbox overflowing? Follow us on Bloglovin instead!

Find the WeSewRetro crew chatting on Facebook and sharing pretties on Pinterest.

3 comments… add one

  • I just bought a McQueen pattern from 1997 that was listed as “vintage”, so I guess it’s a pretty subjective thing. I personally think “vintage” is older than me because I don’t want to think of myself as “vintage”. ;)

    Reply
  • 1997 – vintage? I have items in my larder older than that :)
    I date from about the same time as my pattern so I don’t want to think of it as too old……

    Reply
  • Depends on the style. ;-)

    But it’s vintage.

    “Retro”spective means something that’s new but made in the style of an earlier decade. The pattern you posted was contemporary in style when it was new, so it’s vintage, but the dress you made from it is retro (new, but 1973 style).

    Some are both: This one is vintage (1976) but the style was retrospective to the 1950’s even when the pattern was new . . .

    Reply

Don’t Be Shy » Leave a Comment!

« LAST POST

NEXT POST »