"Proportioned" Skirt Patterns – Useful or not?

I’m a taller-than-average person, so I’m often frustrated by the fact that Petite and Half-size patterns are available but the vertically gifted have no customized options in vintage patterns.

Or so I thought!

I stumbled across a few patterns for skirts in Proportioned Sizes:
Short: 5’3″ and under
Medium: 5’4″ to 5’6″
Tall: 5’7″ and over

Of course, I had to have one. I’m a sucker. I was hoping for more length between the waist and hip, or maybe side seam pockets that had longer/lower openings to accommodate my lanky arms more comfortably.

Nope. The only thing proportioned about this pattern is the hemline. Bummer. I don’t find this proportioned pattern stuff helpful. Do you?

Crossposted on my blog, Chronically Uncool.

• Meet the Author • ChronicallyUncool

Love what you've seen so far? Subscribe by email to receive all the week's posts delivered to your inbox in one big glorious email every Friday.

Inbox overflowing? Follow us on Bloglovin instead!

Find the WeSewRetro crew chatting on Facebook and sharing pretties on Pinterest.

3 comments… add one

  • I have a similar pattern with skirts and trousers. I haven't really checked out the skirt portion since drafting a pencil skirt is easier than altering a pattern for one, but the trousers include instructions for altering hem, crotch depth, and leg length (at the thigh).

  • I would have made the same assumptions you did. I have seen proportioned shirtwaister patterns which have varying neck-back and skirt (hem) length. I do have a proportional late 60s/early 70s shorts and trousers pattern in my stash, will have to see what alterations it includes.

    I wonder if the basic fitting patterns would be more useful for your alterations?

  • I was disappointed in a similar way with a dress pattern – all the length was added or taken out at the waist and hem, where I could easily have done it myself.


Don’t Be Shy » Leave a Comment!